Romo plays through pain to lead Cowboys past Redskins; Dallas’ points all on FGs

ARLINGTON, Texas – Tony Romo’s broken rib hurt so much he needed a second pain-killing injection. His centre had a tendency to snap the ball too soon or to the wrong spot. And he couldn’t get into the end zone no matter what, not even with a first down on the two-yard line.

Yet Romo and the Dallas Cowboys did the only thing that mattered. They won.

Story continues below


Dan Bailey kicked six field goals, including a go-ahead 40-yarder with 1:52 left, and linebacker Anthony Spencer forced a fumble that teammate Sean Lee recovered with 28 seconds left, giving the Cowboys an 18-16 victory over the Washington Redskins on Monday night.

“It feels good right now because we won,” Romo said, smiling and wincing. “I’ll be all right.”

Romo was 22 of 36 for 255 yards. His best stat was simply lasting all four quarters.

The fact that he needed a second injection could explain the quarter-sized blotch of blood that appeared on his jersey above his left hip during the game. After the game, he joked that his new bride forced him to play, saying, “I can’t have a weak husband lying around the house.”

“I want to play,” Romo said. “We only get to go out and do this 16 times, 16 days out of 365 days a year. You want to be out there. You put so much effort, when you go, you go.”

Romo was hardly hit in the first half, then the Redskins got in several crushing blows starting just after halftime. That’s also when the snaps became an issue. He couldn’t hide his frustration with new centre Phil Costa, and clearly wasn’t happy with receiver Kevin Ogletree after an incompletion at the end of the drive that reached the two-yard line; that failure forced Dallas to settle for its fifth field goal and a 16-15 deficit instead of a go-ahead touchdown.

Rob Ryan’s re-energized Dallas defence got the ball back quickly, and Romo took advantage. Another bad snap left the Cowboys with a third-and-21, and Romo followed with a rollout to his right and a deep pass to Dez Bryant for a 30-yard gain. Another 15 yards were tacked on because of a facemask penalty on the beaten defender – cornerback DeAngelo Hall, who last week said he was hoping “to put my helmet on whatever’s hurt” on Romo and all other wounded Cowboys.

Hall had plenty more to say after the game. In an expletive-filled interview, he questioned the eight-man front on Bryant’s catch and the official’s decision to flag him.

“I told the ref after that call, that might have been his worst call of the game,” Hall said. “He’s going to get demerit points for that call. Because that wasn’t no facemask.”

When Washington quarterback Rex Grossman’s fumble was recovered by Lee, Cowboys coach Jason Garrett dropped to a knee and pumped his fist wildly. He had good reason to celebrate: Dallas was about to be 2-1, guaranteeing no repeat of last year’s miserable 1-7 start. The Cowboys are even tied for first place in the NFC East, along with Washington (2-1), which was seeking its first 3-0 start since 2005.

“We’re better than last year – already,” Dallas linebacker Bradie James said.

This was the second straight game that a Romo-Bailey tandem pulled out a victory. Against San Francisco a week ago Sunday, Bailey made a tying field goal at the end of regulation, then the winner in overtime.

Bailey’s other kicks Monday night covered 41 (twice), 32, 27 and 23 yards.

“We had good snaps, good holds, great protection. I had the easy job,” said Bailey, an undrafted rookie who was named the nation’s top kicker in college last season at Oklahoma State. “Whenever you can string a couple of kicks together, it’s a confidence booster.”

Romo wasn’t the only Dallas player who gutted it out.

Bryant missed the previous game with a thigh injury, yet had four catches for 63 yards. Felix Jones, who separated a shoulder against the 49ers, ran for a career-high 115 yards and caught three passes for 40 more. Jason Witten fought through a rib injury to catch six passes for 60 yards.

“It wasn’t a perfect performance by any means, but enough to win the game,” Garrett said.

The Dallas defence limited the Redskins to field goals on two of their first three drives, the latter reaching the Dallas nine-yard line.

Grossman really only had one solid drive, a 76-yarder capped by a one-yard touchdown pass to Tim Hightower that put Washington up 16-9. The Redskins never even crossed midfield after that, punting on three straight drives then losing the fumble.

“It feels like the waste of a week,” tight end Chris Cooley said. “We’re capable of winning a division game on the road. I’m disappointed with the way we finished.”

Grossman was 22 of 37 for 250 yards. He was sacked three times – once by DeMarcus Ware, his NFL-leading fifth – and threw an interception.

Explaining his game-deciding fumble, Grossman said, “I was trying to make a play. I felt like I could get the ball to Santana (Moss). I obviously couldn’t.”

Most of the Redskins’ points came from Graham Gano, who made field goals of 50, 46 and 27 yards. Another was blocked after a poor hold.

“We’re going to find out what type of football team we have,” Redskins coach Mike Shanahan said. “When you lose like that it hurts. We don’t have time to feel sorry for yourself.”

Notes: This was Dallas’ ninth straight game decided by three points or less. … Dallas improved to just 9-8 at Cowboys Stadium. The Redskins are 0-3. … Bailey had the most field goals for Dallas since Billy Cundiff kicked seven in 2003. … Washington’s LaRon Landry had four tackles and forced a fumble in his first game since November because of injuries. … This was the 15th Dallas-Washington game on a Monday night. The only teams that have met more are Denver-Raiders, 16 times.

More supermarkets bagging do-it-yourself checkout lanes in name of customer service

MANCHESTER, Conn. – When Keith Wearne goes grocery shopping, checking out with a cashier is worth the few extra moments, rather than risking that a self-serve machine might go awry and delay him even more.

Most shoppers side with Wearne, studies show. And with that in mind, some grocery store chains nationwide are bagging the do-it-yourself option, once considered the wave of the future, in the name of customer service.

Story continues below


“It’s just more interactive,” Wearne said during a recent shopping trip at Manchester’s Big Y Foods. “You get someone who says hello; you get a person to talk to if there’s a problem.”

Big Y Foods, which has 61 locations in Connecticut and Massachusetts, recently became one of the latest to announce it was phasing out the self-serve lanes. Some other regional chains and major players, including some Albertsons locations, have also reduced their unstaffed lanes and added more clerks to traditional lanes.

Market studies cited by the Arlington, Va.-based Food Marketing Institute found only 16 per cent of supermarket transactions in 2010 were done at self-checkout lanes in stores that provided the option. That’s down from a high of 22 per cent three years ago.

Overall, people reported being much more satisfied with their supermarket experience when they used traditional cashier-staffed lanes.

Supermarket chains started introducing self-serve lanes about 10 years ago, touting them as an easy way for shoppers to scan their own items’ bar codes, pay, bag their bounty and head out on their way. Retailers also anticipated a labour savings, potentially reducing the number of cashier shifts as they encouraged shoppers to do it themselves.

The reality, though, was mixed. Some shoppers loved them and were quick converts, while other reactions ranged from disinterest to outright hatred – much of it shared on blogs or in Facebook groups.

An internal study by Big Y found delays in its self-service lines caused by customer confusion over coupons, payments and other problems; intentional and accidental theft, including misidentifying produce and baked goods as less-expensive varieties; and other problems that helped guide its decision to bag the self-serve lanes.

Wearne, 39, a Tolland resident who owns a power-washing service, reluctantly used a self-serve lane at the Manchester Big Y to ring up granola bars and a 12-pack of Miller Genuine Draft but had to wait while a clerk checked his identification.

If he hadn’t seen the clerk standing there immediately ready to help, he said, he would have used the traditional lanes, as he usually does.

But for time-crunched Greg Styles, a self-described “get-it-and-go type of guy,” the top priority is paying and leaving without lingering in a checkout lane.

Styles, a 47-year-old South Windsor resident, says the convenience of the self-serve lanes fits into his busy life as a college lacrosse coach and father of 7-year-old twins.

“I’m not happy about it, not at all,” Styles said of the change, ringing up baked goods and chicken breasts on a recent afternoon at Big Y’s Manchester store. “I like to get in and get out. These lanes are quick and really easy, so I use them all the time.”

He’s not the typical shopper, though, according to research.

While some chains are reducing their self-serve options, others say they’re keeping it in place along with the traditional lanes because they think giving shoppers that choice is an important part of customer service.

“Our philosophy is giving customers options. People shop in different ways and we want to accommodate their preferences,” said Suzi Robinson, a spokeswoman for Stop & Shop Supermarket Co., which has self-serve lanes in about 85 per cent of its nearly 400 stores in the Northeast.

Another chain, Boise, Idaho-based Albertsons LLC, has said it’s phasing out self-service lanes. Kroger says it’s keeping the self-service option because customers like it, although one remodeled store replaced it with another quick-checkout method that uses a cashier.

Phil Lempert, a Santa Monica, Calif.-based food industry analyst, noted that supermarkets have a few other motivations to get rid of the self-serve lanes beyond customer service.

They will eventually need to replace their checkout computers to read newly emerging types of bar codes, so there’s little business sense in keeping and replacing those self-serve machines if they’re not well-used anyway, he said.

Perhaps more important, he said, the growing trend toward using bar code-reading programs on smartphones is likely to change everything in supermarket shopping over time.

Some scholars who follow the retail food industry say decisions by Big Y and others to do away with the self-serve checkout lanes aren’t necessarily the death knell of the trend. Home Depot and some other businesses, which cater to customers with a do-it-yourself mentality, report success with their self-serve lanes.

But not all supermarket shoppers share that mentality, and whether they embrace or reject the self-serve option may come down to demographics – such as whether they’re in a tech-savvy region – and other factors that the supermarkets cannot control.

“I think some of the stores are just deciding that, on the balance, it’s a negative. Other stores, because they have a different composition of shoppers, are deciding to keep it,” John Stanton, a professor of food marketing at St. Joseph’s University in Philadelphia, said of the self-serve option.

“I don’t think this is as much a referendum on the technology as much as it is a match between the technology and the customer base,” he said.

Borough mayors ask AMT to reconsider fare hikes

 The mayors of Montreal’s suburbs are asking AMT to reconsider proposed fare increases of as much as 20%.

To some borough mayors the recent decision by the AMT to re-zone train stations seems completely arbitrary. For Michel Bissonnet, the city’s point man on transit, fee hikes for some train users simply because the AMT has decided to revisit zoning is unacceptable.

“Particularly in Ville Lasalle, in Lachine, in St-Laurent, in Ahuntsic, there’s 4 stations there and the tariff is class number one.”

Story continues below


The AMT wants to change the zoning classification for those sectors to class two. The reason?
The stations are more than 8 kilometers away from the city. That means users who are accustomed to paying a lower rate because they’re closer to downtown could see the cost of their monthly passes increase by 21%. An increase that some borough mayors worry will be an even bigger financial burden on their citizens.

“Just realize that it’s close to $20 per month for an adult, 12 multiplied by $20. So you’re $240 just for 1 person, so a family of four its more than five, six hundred dollars per year. It’s like another tax finally,” says Lachine mayor Claude Dauphin.

The AMT announced the changes a couple of weeks ago, now the mayors of the affected boroughs, as well as a couple who don’t even have train service in their sectors yet, are speaking out.

The borough of St-Laurent, for example, has two stations in zone two and one in zone one. That zone one station is now slated to become zone two.

“It penalizes people who can least afford it,” says St-Laurent mayor Alan de Sousa, “it penalizes students it doesn’t make any sense at all that to raise the tariffs at Montepelier touches 632 thousand people.”

People, he says, who could instead take the metro from Cote Vertu and save themselves nearly $30 a month.

Lasalle is in the same situation. They’re trying to re-zone industrial land to develop housing, that would include bus and train service.

“So in this area people will be able to, you know, to use no car at all to go to work but now we are losing this incentive to move in this area because of the big increase in price,” says Lasalle mayor Manon Barbe.

The mayors hope that by challenging the rate hike, the amt will revisit its decision. They plan on presenting their motion to city council.


Eiffel Tower-top show gives picture-perfect start to Paris’ ready-to-wear week

PARIS – It would have been impossible to plan a more picture-postcard perfect start to Paris fashion week than Portuguese designer Fatima Lopes’ spring-summer 2012 ready-to-wear display Tuesday atop the Eiffel Tower, where the clothes fought for the audience’s attention with a breathtaking view of the City of Light.

Story continues below

HangZhou Night Net

Sure, the venue presented a unique set of challenges: Ushering hundreds of fashionistas perched atop vertiginous heels and sewn into hobblingly narrow skirts into any old building is difficult enough under the best of circumstances. Whisking them hundreds of metres into the air atop one of the world’s most frequented tourist sites aboard achingly slow turn-of-the-century elevators is another problem altogether.

But even though they had to rub shoulders with the touristus vulgaris and dodge packs of souvenir sellers who proved even more pesky than the paparazzi, fashion insiders were tickled by the Lopes display – the first fashion show anyone could remember atop the Eiffel Tower.

Day 1 of Paris’ marathon nine-day-long collections is generally dominated by up-and-coming labels, and Tuesday was no exception. The French fashion world’s latest darling, Belgian designer Anthony Vaccarello, was the sartorial high point of the day, with his sex-drenched collection of ultra-minidresses aimed at a very specific demographic: jet-set party girls with endless legs.

Paris fashion week ratchets it up a gear on Wednesday, with displays by another Belgian critical darling, Dries Van Noten, and British bad boy Gareth Pugh.


Vaccarello won one of the French fashion world’s top prizes – this year’s ANDAM award – and the feeling that this young Belgian-born designer has friends in high places was faintly palpable at the show: On a day dominated by small houses of limited means, Vaccarello’s display stood out for its high production value and cast of coveted top models.

Luckily, the clothes – black ultra-minidresses with sexy cutout panelling, suggestive zippers and webbing that looked sure to snare just about any prey – lived up to the girls wearing them.

Leggy American model Karlie Kloss vamped it up in an asymmetrical gown that looked like it had mated with 1980s swimsuits, leaving one of her endless legs entirely uncovered up to the hip, while the other was swathed in rippling panels of stretchy knits.

Narrow bands of material looped around metal wiring to form the barest of tops – paired with the shortest of skirts in gleaming microfibre. A plunging V-neckline and bare back won a black onesie the title of world’s sexiest overalls.

Besides some tops in sheer snake printed silk, everything was black or navy – and looked short and steamy enough to become the new uniform of the elite army of international party girls.


As the first model emerged onto the Eiffel Tower-top catwalk, thick black curtains parted to reveal a phenomenal view over Paris, and the low beige cityscape – bathed in the radiant glow of the Indian summer sum – competed for the audience’s attention with the clothes themselves.

Had the garments not been in screaming neons, the view might have won out.

But Lopes punctuated her featherweight slip dresses in translucent silks with vinyl detailings in a rainbow of eye-popping shades. The fluorescent orange neckline of an ankle-length beige sundress recalled a cyclist’s safety vest. A second-skin bustier dress was a patchwork of vertical strips of fuchsia, lemon and tangerine polyurethane. The barely pubescent models’ lips were lacquered in matching shades, and they wore 15-centimetre heels adorned with metal hardware that recalled the Eiffel Tower’s steel beams and struts.

It was the first time in recent memory that a fashion show on Paris’ official calendar has been held in the iconic monument – and considering the logistical challenge of getting everyone up the tower, it was probably just as well.

Still, though they’d never admit as much, even the most blase globe-trotting fashion insiders got a kick out of their trip up one of the world’s most iconic monuments.


The Japanese label served up lightweight A-line dresses and cropped trousers with trompe l’oeil panelling. Some of the looks were clever, like a pair of culottes embellished with a panel of shiny material that made it look as if a pair of hot pants had been layered on top. Simple A-line dresses were fitted out with flaps that mimicked ladylike little jackets.

Overall, it was easy, breezy streetwear that you could imagine making the leap from the catwalk to real life.


For his second ready-to-wear collection, Italian designer Corrado de Biase delivered a convincing collection of bias-cut gowns in airy silks with a flapper-ish appeal. De Biase, an accessories designer who’s collaborated with heavyweight houses including John Galliano, counterbalanced the feather lightness of the silks with quilted satin, served up on cropped jackets and culottes in pretty Asian prints.

Surrey man convicted of stabbing pregnant girlfriend to death gets new trial

A man who was convicted of stabbing his pregnant girlfriend to death has had his murder conviction overturned and a new trial ordered.

In June 2008, a B.C. Supreme Court jury found Amjad Khan and Naim Mohammed Saghir, an alleged accomplice, guilty of the first-degree murder of Khan’s girlfriend Tasha Lynn Rossette, 21.

The victim’s body was found by her sister on Nov. 22, 2005 lying at the threshold of her Surrey apartment.

Story continues below

HangZhou Night Net

She’d been stabbed 40 times with a knife, with some of the stab wounds being defensive. Her throat had been slashed. Rossette was four months’ pregant with Khan’s child.

The couple, who had known each other since high school, had begun a casual sexual relationship in late 2004.

The Crown’s theory at trial was that Khan feared he would bring shame to his family if it were known he was a father and he didn’t want to have the responsibility of having a child.

Prosecutors called several “unsavoury” witnesses to bolster their theory.

One of the witnesses said that Khan told him the pregnant girl was not going to have an abortion and that “the only way to get rid of this problem is to kill her.”

Khan offered to buy the witness a car if he killed the girl, court heard.

The witness also said that Saghir came to him and told him that he’d killed the girl Khan had gotten pregnant.

Saghir told the witness that he had to “slice that bitch’s throat because she was fighting back,” court heard.

At trial, Khan denied killing Rossette and said that on the night of the murder he’d dropped her off at her apartment house and then went home.

On appeal, he and Saghir put forward a number of grounds of appeal.

In a ruling posted online Tuesday, the B.C. Court of Appeal found that three of those grounds were sufficient to overturn the conviction and require a new trial.

One of the grounds related to an allegation by the accused that the Crown had improperly bolstered the credibility of one of the unsavoury witnesses.

In his reasons for judgment, B.C. Court of Appeal Justice David Frankel said the so-called oath-helping evidence was exacerbated by the Crown referring to it in closing submissions and by the judge referring to it in summarizing the Crown’s case.

Frankel also found that the Crown had improperly cross-examined Khan with respect to how he conducted himself while being interviewed by the police.

“Further, the charge to the jury with respect to the third-party suspect defence was flawed,” he said. “In light of these errors the convictions cannot stand.”

The third-party suspect defence referred to a theory by the defence that someone else was responsible for the murder.

Madam Justice Risa Levine and Justice Harvey Groberman concurred in Frankel’s reasons.

Simone Rossette, the victim’s mother, was clearly distraught when reached by telephone on Tuesday.

“I just found out about it two minutes ago,” she said. “I just talked to the police. I can’t say anything right now. I have to phone my daughter.”


‘Modern Family’ star Sofia Vergara launches line of affordable clothing

NEW YORK, N.Y. – At times, it’s hard to tell the difference between Sofia Vergara and Gloria, the character she plays on ABC’s hit comedy “Modern Family.”

Both have gregarious personalities, an uproarious sense of humour, an enormous shot of sex appeal and daring fashion sense.

Story continues below

HangZhou Night Net

Now other women can be more like Vergara – or Gloria – thanks to the Colombian star’s new clothing line at Kmart. The line features the kind of outfits that have made Vergara so popular on the red carpet and beyond – figure-hugging dresses, tight pants, bright colours and short skirts.

“We have a lot of very comfortable and wearable things that can be worn by a woman of every size,” Vergara explained of her Sofia clothing.

“We have a lot of colourful things like a dress you can wear with tights, or you can wear under your leggings and still look well put together and sexy.”

The Sofia line, available at affordable prices, also includes accessories, camisoles, shirts, skirts and jackets.

The 39-year-old Emmy-nominated actress talked more about her line, “Modern Family” and celebrating her “Latin-ness” during a stop at Kmart, accompanied by The Associated Press.

AP: Why did you want to design your own fashion collection?

Vergara: I always wanted to do it. I always had the thing for fashion, for beauty. But, I always wanted to team up with somebody like Kmart because that is what I wanted to create, a line that was affordable, that was for women of all sizes, every ethnicity, that could make them feel cute and beautiful without spending thousands of dollars.

AP: Do you wear items from your collection?

Vergara: I actually wear all of it. Everything (points to what she is wearing) is from Kmart. I love it. I wanted it to be pieces I would wear, pieces that I like. That’s why I work with a very good group of designers and experts. I helped pick all of the materials, the models, the buttons, everything. So it was like the stuff that I like and the stuff that I wear.

AP: Have you ever thought about doing a high-end line?

Vergara: No, not really. I never was interested in that. I always wanted to create a line that was for my fans, for the girls that have always approached me and asked me, “Where did you get that outfit” or “I would have never thought to wear this with this. That is so great.” I think that is even more fun, to be able to create cute clothes and they look like they were very high-end clothes, but they are not.

AP: Since you’re considered a sex symbol by many fans, do you feel that you have to be perfectly dressed at all times?

Vergara: No, I don’t think it is a responsibility, but I just like to be well put together. I am Latin. We grow up taking care of ourselves. I remember my whole life watching my mom getting ready to take us to school wearing rollers and putting her lipstick on. It is part of my culture, to dress like a woman and to be like a woman.

AP: With this fashion line and your success on “Modern Family,” do you feel like you’re opening doors for other Latina actresses?

Vergara: I think we had a great opening of the new season. I love that some networks now are trying to look for more Latin actresses to have on their networks because it is so amazing how the American public has accepted Gloria and her accent and all her Latin-ness, so it is great.

ABC is owned by The Walt Disney Co.




Polanski attends Zurich film festival for award, new cinematic ‘memoir’ of his life

ZURICH – Two years after police in Zurich led Roman Polanski away to prison, the Oscar-winning director returned to a very different reception in the city, where he wrapped himself in applause and recognition Tuesday night by picking up a cinematic award and releasing a “memoir” of his life that had been treated like a state secret.

Story continues below

HangZhou Night Net

The Polish-French director of “Rosemary’s Baby” took the stage of the Zurich Film Festival to finally accept the lifetime achievement award that he was unable to pick up in 2009, after being arrested for a decades-old sex-crime case.

He had been arrested by Swiss police on arrival at the Zurich airport on a U.S. warrant from 1978, then spent months in prison and later house arrest because of charges that he had sex with a 13-year-old girl in 1977.

But he successfully avoided extradition to the United States after the Swiss government declined to deport him.

“I mean, who else would have the guts to come to this festival after he has been arrested here?” said This Brunner, a Swiss film and art expert in Zurich. “He has a unique personality, he has a huge heart.”

Zurich Mayor Corine Mauch said Polanski deserved the award for his body of film work and she saw no anti-U.S. sentiment in the warm reception he received, particularly since his legal status was “clarified” in Swiss courts.

“He’s a free man in Switzerland,” she said. “And I’m happy that after two years, he is able to get his prize here.”

Now able to travel unhindered to Switzerland, Polanski, 78, arrived at the festival hall as a spotlight followed him. Several hundred people stood to applaud him as he took his seat. He later strode to the stage amid nearly a minute’s sustained clapping.

“Friends, what can I can say? Better late than never,” he began, as the audience erupted in laughter.

“Two years, day for day. Certain parts of it I would rather forget. But I’m happy to be here, because I know that it was not only a blow to me, to my family, but also to the festival itself,” he said. “It’s a very moving moment for me.”

Though Polanski could joke about the ordeal, he acknowledged the pain of it but said little else, allowing the world premier of a full-length documentary – “Roman Polanski: A Film Memoir” – to largely speak for him.

“I would only like to take the opportunity of being here to thank all those who supported me during these difficult months. I would particularly like to say my thanks to the prison staff for trying to make my stay there as bearable as possible,” he added.

Polanski still faces an Interpol warrant in effect for 188 countries for extradition to the United States. He moves freely between Switzerland, which refused to extradite him, and France, which has a blanket policy of not extraditing its citizens.

In July 2010, he made his first public appearance since being released from house arrest, attending the Montreux Jazz Festival to watch his wife, the actress and singer Emmanuelle Seigner, perform on stage.

This year, his new film, “Carnage,” had its world premiere at the Venice Film Festival.

But his “other” new film – the memoir – was kept secret by Zurich’s film organizers. The film recounts his Polish roots and includes footage of World War II and the Nazi invasion of Poland interspersed with scenes from “The Pianist.”

The documentary by Laurent Bouzereau is based on interviews with Polanski during his house arrest two years ago, and begins with shots of the Swiss prison that Polanski was incarcerated at, as well as photos of his chalet in the chic resort of Gstaad in the Swiss Alps.

By turns funny and sad, wistful and horrified, Polanski recounts a kaleidoscope of memories, such as seeing a woman shot in the back by a Nazi, his running away from a Nazi soldier shooting at him, and being reunited with his father and seeing the wall in Warsaw first being built.

Polanski talks about his mother’s death, the pain of his father remarrying another woman, and their visit to him in Gstaad where his father cried upon hearing music that reminded him of children being loaded into train barracks to be exterminated.

“It was an Apocalyptic, surrealistic vision,” Polanski recalled of the moment.

Polanski said he watched films so he could read subtitles: “I started really learning to read in the cinema,” he said.

British actress Alice Eve, a juror for the film festival, said she wasn’t sure if attendance at the Polanski award ceremony could be considered a political statement.

“If it is, then I’m happy to be part of it. Because I do believe that he has paid for his crime, and he’s also good at what he does, and the celebration isn’t undue,” she said of Polanski.

Over 45,000 visitors are expected to attend the seventh installment of the film festival in Switzerland’s biggest city that includes ten world premieres and runs through Oct. 2.

Israel approves 1,100 new homes in east Jerusalem, drawing criticism from Palestinians, US, EU

Comments Off on Israel approves 1,100 new homes in east Jerusalem, drawing criticism from Palestinians, US, EU

JERUSALEM – Israel granted the go-ahead on Tuesday for construction of 1,100 new Jewish housing units in east Jerusalem, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ruled out any freeze in settlement construction, raising already heightened tensions after last week’s Palestinian move to seek U.N. membership.

Story continues below

HangZhou Night Net

Israel’s Interior Ministry said the homes would be built in Gilo, a sprawling Jewish enclave in southeast Jerusalem. It said construction could begin after a mandatory 60-day period for public comment, a process that spokesman Roi Lachmanovich called a formality.

The announcement drew swift condemnation from the Palestinians, who claim east Jerusalem as their future capital. The United States, European Union and United Nations all expressed disappointment with Israel’s decision.

In Washington, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the Israeli announcement was counterproductive to efforts to relaunch Mideast peace talks. She said both Israel and the Palestinians should avoid provocative actions, and that international mediators will remain focused on guiding the two sides back to direct negotiations.

Richard Miron, a spokesman for U.N. Mideast envoy Robert Serry, said the announcement “sends the wrong signal at this sensitive time.”

The Palestinians have demanded that Israel halt all settlement construction in east Jerusalem and the adjacent West Bank – territories captured by Israel in the 1967 Mideast war – as a condition for resuming peace talks.

Since capturing east Jerusalem, Israel has annexed the area and ringed it with about 10 Jewish enclaves that are meant to solidify its control. Gilo, which is close to the Palestinian city of Bethlehem, is among the largest, with about 50,000 residents. Israel’s annexation of east Jerusalem has not been internationally recognized.

Meir Margalit, a Jerusalem city council member who is critical of east Jerusalem construction, said city officials had given initial approval to the Gilo project more than a year ago.

Margalit said he didn’t expect the project to be “an obstacle of peace” since it is in an existing Jewish area that is widely expected to remain part of Israel in any peace deal. But he said Interior Minister Eli Yishai, leader of the hawkish Shas Party, appeared to have timed the approval as a response to the Palestinian statehood gambit. Yishai declined an interview request.

Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator, said the Israeli decision amounted to “1,100 no’s to the resumption of peace talks.”

He urged the United States, Israel’s closest and most important ally, to change its position and support the Palestinians in their quest for U.N. membership. The United States has repeatedly called on Israel to cease settlement construction on land that could constitute a Palestinian state, but says the U.N. is not the proper place to resolve the conflict.

With peace talks stalled for the past three years, the Palestinians last week asked the U.N. Security Council to recognize an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza Strip. Although the move won’t change the situation on the ground, the Palestinians believe international support will boost their position in future peace negotiations.

The U.S. has vowed to veto the Palestinian request in the Security Council. Both Israel and the U.S. say a Palestinian state can be established only through negotiations.

In an interview published Tuesday, Netanyahu ruled out any settlement freeze, arguing that a 10-month moratorium on new housing construction last year had failed to yield results.

The Palestinians, saying his limited freeze was insufficient, agreed to resume negotiations just weeks before the moratorium ended. Netanyahu then refused a U.S.-backed Palestinian demand to extend it, and the talks quickly collapsed.

“The Palestinians, by coming back to the issue of the settlement freeze, indicate that they don’t really want to negotiate,” Netanyahu told the Jerusalem Post. “They use it again and again, but I think a lot of people see it as a ruse to avoid direct negotiations.”

Netanyahu has called for the resumption of peace talks without preconditions. He has dismissed demands that a Palestinian state be based on Israel’s 1967 prewar lines – putting him at odds with the Obama administration.

Seeking to break the deadlock, the international Quartet of Mideast mediators – the U.S., EU, U.N. and Russia – last week called on Israelis and Palestinians to resume negotiations without preconditions. It called for a peace agreement to end the more than 60-year-old conflict by the end of next year and urged both sides “to refrain from provocative actions.”

The fate of east Jerusalem is the most explosive issue in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The sector is home to Jerusalem’s Old City, which houses sensitive Jewish, Muslim and Christian holy sites.

Netanyahu says he will never relinquish east Jerusalem, which Israel considers an integral part of its capital. The Palestinian leadership has vowed it will not accept a state without key parts of east Jerusalem as its capital.

In all, about 200,000 Jews live in east Jerusalem areas that Israel calls neighbourhoods and the Palestinians call settlements. Squeezed between them are Arab neighbourhoods that are home to some 250,000 Palestinians.

Hugh MacDonald will not seek reelection

Veteran Liberal MLA Hugh MacDonald has decided he will not seek re-election, the party’s executive director said Tuesday.

“I can confirm that he let the leader (Raj Sherman) know last week that he will not be seeking re-election,” Corey Hogan said after unconfirmed rumours began circulating online.

“Raj asked him if he would run again and he said, essentially, ‘I’m tired.’ “

MacDonald, 56, could not be reached for comment Tuesday afternoon.

Story continues below

HangZhou Night Net

The 15-year veteran Liberal MLA, was a candidate in the race to become leader of the Liberal party but was defeated earlier this month by ousted Tory MLA and party newcomer Raj Sherman.

During the contest he regularly attacked Sherman during debates and was vocal about his dissatisfaction with changes to the Liberal leadership election process, which allowed thousands of party “supporters” to vote in addition to paying members.

Despite his concerns about the process, MacDonald said he would accept the results and planned to stay with the party. “I would not encourage any political party ever to experiment with this sort of process again,” he said at the time.

MacEwan University political scientist Chaldeans Mensah said the MacDonald’s tough criticism of Sherman during the debates was a harbinger of things to come.

“A stalwart member who has been an important part of the team has decided not to run,” he said. “It does raise questions about caucus unity and Sherman’s leadership.”

The question, Mensah said, is whether Sherman will be able to mend the fractured party in time for the coming provincial election, widely anticipated to be called within the next six months.

“There’s no question that Hugh MacDonald is part of the party establishment,” Mensah said. “His concern is reflective of a concern among some in the Liberal Party about having what some consider an interloper – someone from outside – taking over the party.

“Is this the tip of the iceberg, so to speak? Or is this just an isolated defection from the team?”

Sherman spokesman Jonathan Huckabay declined to comment Tuesday.

Actor Rob Lowe says Bollywood market lured him to coming-of-age tale ‘Breakaway’

TORONTO – Rob Lowe has been a pin-up boy, a movie idol, a TV star and – most recently – a bestselling author.

Now, he’s intent on becoming a movie mogul.

The veteran actor says his new role as part owner of the vast Miramax film library has him scouting for money-making productions that could involve partnering with Canadian and foreign filmmakers.

Story continues below

HangZhou Night Net

Lowe says it’s a big reason he appears in the Indo-Canadian hockey film, “Breakaway,” an amalgam of Bollywood and sports movie tropes that hits theatres around the world this weekend.

“I was really interested in the theme of assimilation and what it means to belong and in terms of fathers and sons, what it means to break that bond and go your own way,” Lowe said of the coming-of-age tale when it debuted at the recent Toronto International Film Festival.

“And as a businessman, as I’ve started to transition into that area, I was really interested in the Bollywood business and I thought this would be a good way to learn.”

The Toronto-shot “Breakaway” treads familiar Canuck ground by revolving around an underdog hockey phenom. The twist here is that the on-ice star is an Indo-Canadian kid struggling to assert his independence from overbearing immigrant parents.

Rajveer Singh, played by newcomer Vinay Virmani, is more interested in hanging out at the community rink than working at his uncle’s trucking company. When the local amateur team rejects him despite a stellar on-ice performance, Rajveer forms his own team with his South Asian pals and they make a bid for the championships.

Lowe plays the rink manager and the team’s coach, but his character also happens to be an ex-NHLer with a few hard-won lessons up his sleeve. He also has a lovely sister, who inspires colourful Bollywood fantasies in the lovestruck Rajveer.

“I was interested in seeing what a hybrid would look like and that’s what this movie really is,” Lowe said.

The film’s global aspirations are bolstered by cameos from Indian stars Akshay Kumar (who also executive produced the film) and Anupam Kher (“Bend It Like Beckham”), and rap stars Drake and Ludacris. Meanwhile, Canadian comic superstar Russell Peters turns up as a wisecracking Wall Street hotshot poised to marry into the Singh family.

Virmani said he was awestruck the first time he met Lowe on set, noting that the Hollywood star once played a hockey prospect much like Rajveer in 1986’s “Youngblood.”

“I shot about six hours of hockey in the afternoon, (and then) I was going to do this big dramatic scene with Rob,” recalled Virmani, who also co-wrote the script.

“I was a little bit nervous and I saw him skating out on the ice. And I said, ‘Hi Mr. Lowe, I’m Vinay Virmani, I’m going to play Rajveer Singh.’ And he just gave me a big hug right away and he said: ‘Ah, you know, this is a homecoming for me man, because 20 years ago I did ‘Youngblood’ here and you’re just where I was. And that’s what I love about Canada, that a brown kid like you can be the next Youngblood!’”

Known as “Speedy Singhs” outside of Canada, “Breakaway” hit 600 theatres in India on Sept. 23, but suffered a dismal opening according to Boxofficereport杭州夜网.

It’s set to screen in the U.K., Middle East, Australia, Fiji, the Far East, Africa and Canada on Friday.

Lowe said his shift to the business side of the industry began about a year and a half ago when he partnered with a group of financiers behind Filmyard Holdings. They bought Miramax as their first investment and Lowe said the first priority is to recapitalize their debt and pay off initial investors.

“We have been in the process of trying to figure out what the new Miramax would look like and we’re deep in the thick of it. Eventually we will make movies at some point… but this first year has been (about) building infrastructure and monetizing our library,” said Lowe, referring to widespread reports the company is seeking digital deals.

“Obviously the next phase of that will be making movies and what does that look like for us and how do we do it? There’s a lot of different ways we’re thinking about doing it.”

CEO Mike Lang was among the executives at the Toronto film fest hunting for revenue opportunities for Miramax’s 700-plus titles, which include “Pulp Fiction,” the “Kill Bill” series and the “Spy Kids” franchise, said Lowe.

The film star didn’t rule out teaming up with Canadian filmmakers down the line to collaborate on big-screen ventures.

“We’re actively looking for partnerships right now with some of our project libraries that we inherited, actual scripts,” said Lowe.

“I think it’s $500 million worth of undeveloped material that we inherited, that (Miramax founders) Bob and Harvey (Weinstein) developed and they have great taste. So one of the things we’re doing is looking for creative partners to maybe move forward with those.”

Lowe said his hectic work schedule required him to commute throughout the “Breakaway” shoot between Toronto and L.A., where he plays peppy city manager Chris Traeger on NBC’s “Parks and Recreation.”

But he spoke effusively about his time north of the border, rattling off favourite restaurants, his affinity for a downtown sports bar and the beauty of cottage country north of Toronto where he managed to squeeze in a three-day writing session for his recent memoir, “Stories I Only Tell My Friends.”

“I think the most writing I got done on the book was here during this movie in Muskoka as the leaves were falling,” he said.

“And I’ve been to Muskoka – I go every year, we have friends that have a house there and I love it – but I’d never been in the fall/winter and man, you could just feel the hammer was about to come down.”

Now that he’s waded into the high stakes arena of film financing, Lowe said he’s eager to learn more about a South Asian film market that appears ripe for savvy North American filmmakers.

“I’m in the film business and even I don’t really have a proper grasp of how potent it is,” he says.

“Breakaway” opens across the country Friday.

‘L Word’ actress escorted from flight after kissing woman

The publicist for a lesbian actress and musician who says she was escorted off a flight for “one modest kiss” of her partner says the encounter was not a stunt for her band’s upcoming breast cancer awareness tour.

Leisha Hailey, best known for playing Alice Pieszecki in the now defunct Showtime lesbian life drama “The L Word,” asked her Twitter followers to boycott Southwest Airlines after the encounter Monday.

The airline responded that Hailey’s display of affection was excessive and drew customer complaints.

Story continues below

HangZhou Night Net

The actress and her partner, Camila Grey, denied in a statement released Tuesday that the affection they showed toward each other was inappropriate.

“We want to make it clear we were not making out or creating any kind of spectacle of ourselves, it was one modest kiss,” the written statement said. “We are responsible adult women who walk through the world with dignity. We were simply being affectionate like any normal couple.”

Hailey and Grey acknowledge they became upset after the flight attendant reprimanded them. They said the attendant told them that Southwest is a “family airline.”

“No matter how quietly homophobia is whispered, it doesn’t make it any less loud,” the statement said. “You can’t whisper hate. We ask this airline to teach their employees to not discriminate against any couple, ever, regardless of their own beliefs.”

Hailey and Gray said they plan to file a formal complaint with the airline.

The incident resulted in a national media spotlight for the actress, who now is a part of the electro-pop duo Uh Huh Her. Publicist Libby Coffey said Tuesday that the encounter was real and was “absolutely not” done for attention.

The airline said in a news release posted on its website: “Our crew, responsible for the comfort of all Customers on board, approached the passengers based solely on behaviour and not gender. The conversation escalated to a level that was better resolved on the ground, as opposed to in flight.”

Hailey tweeted that she was escorted off the flight after it landed. The statement said the incident with the flight attendant lasted five minutes.

The air carrier so far has limited its response to the four-sentence statement on its website. Phone calls and emails seeking comment were not returned.

“Initial reports indicate that we received several passenger complaints characterizing the behaviour as excessive,” the statement said in part.

Details of how the couple was escorted off the flight were not included in the Southwest statement. Initial reports had the flight between Baltimore and St. Louis, but a tweet by the band says its members were flying from El Paso, Texas, to Los Angeles.

The band’s Twitter feed also characterized the kiss as fleeting. “I didn’t realize a small peck on the lips is regarded as excessive and never once did your stewardess mention other passengers,” said the tweet from UhHuhHerMusic.

Hailey said in a tweet that she has an audio and video recording of the encounter between the couple and the flight attendant. It’s not immediately clear who made it.

Hailey demanded a public apology and a refund from the airline.

Hailey was a musician before joining the cast of the cable drama featuring the lives of lesbian friends and lovers living in Los Angeles. The show is currently not aired.

Southwest’s website says it is the official airline of the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation.

Herndon Graddick, senior director of programs at GLAAD, said in an email late Monday that “GLAAD contacted Southwest to call for additional actions beyond tonight’s statement that ensure all customers feel comfortable and welcomed while travelling.”

Earlier this month, the Dallas-based airline kicked off Green Day’s lead man Billie Joe Armstrong for wearing his pants too low. The Grammy winner was escorted off a plane after failing to follow a flight attendant’s directive to pull up the pants.

Southwest also removed director Kevin Smith from a flight last year because he didn’t fit properly in a single seat. His first tweet read, “Dear (at)SouthwestAir I know I’m fat, but was (the) captain (…) really justified in throwing me off a flight for which I was already seated?”

Hailey is preparing to launch a 21-city tour with Uh Huh Her to promote breast cancer awareness. One of the band’s songs was included in the 2010 movie “The Kids Are All Right.”

Jackson’s voice, recorded before death, echoes through court at trial of doctor

LOS ANGELES – First, prosecutors showed a photo of Michael Jackson’s pale and lifeless body lying on a gurney. Then they played a recording of his voice, just weeks before his death.

Slow and slurred, his words echoed Tuesday through a Los Angeles courtroom at the start of the trial of the doctor accused of killing him. As a worldwide audience watched on TV and Jackson’s family looked on from inside the courtroom, a drugged Jackson said:

Story continues below

HangZhou Night Net

“We have to be phenomenal. When people leave this show, when people leave my show, I want them to say, ‘I’ve never seen nothing like this in my life. Go. Go. I’ve never seen nothing like this. Go. It’s amazing. He’s the greatest entertainer in the world.”‘

Prosecutors played the audio for the first time during opening statements as they portrayed Dr. Conrad Murray, 58, as an incompetent physician who used a dangerous anesthetic without
adequate safeguards and whose neglect left the superstar abandoned as he lay dying.

Defence attorneys countered that Jackson caused his own death by taking a drug dose, including propofol, after Murray left the room.

Nothing the cardiologist could have done would have saved the King of Pop, defence attorney Ed Chernoff told jurors, because Jackson was desperate to regain his fame and needed rest to prepare for a series of crucial comeback concerts.

A number of Jackson’s family members were in the courthouse, including his father Joseph, mother Katherine, sisters LaToya and Janet, and brothers Jermaine, Randy and Tito. LaToya Jackson carried a sunflower, her brother’s favourite flower.

Murray, who arrived at court holding hands with his mother, is charged with involuntary manslaughter. If convicted, he faces up to four years in prison and the loss of his medical license.

Speaking for more than an hour, prosecutor David Walgren relied on photos and audio recordings to paint Murray as an inept and reckless caretaker.

Walgren showed a photo of a lifeless Jackson on a hospital gurney. He juxtaposed the image with those of Jackson performing. Walgren also played the recording of Jackson speaking to Murray
while, the prosecutor said, the singer was under the influence of an unknown substance roughly six weeks before his death.

Jackson trusted Murray as his physician, and “that misplaced trust in Conrad Murray cost Michael Jackson his life,” Walgren said.

The recurring theme was Jackson’s never-ending quest for sleep and propofol, the potion he called his “milk” and that he believed was the answer. Jurors were told that it was a powerful anesthetic, not a sleep aid, and the prosecutor said Murray severely misused it.

The prosecutor said while working for Jackson, the doctor was shipped more than four gallons of the anesthetic, which is normally given in hospital settings.

Chernoff, the defence attorney, claimed the singer swallowed several pills of the sedative lorazepam on the morning of his death and that was enough to put six people to sleep. After taking
propofol, Jackson did not even have a chance to close his eyes, Chernoff said.

Chernoff, who had long hinted that the defence would blame Jackson for his own death, added a surprise. He claimed that Jackson died not because his doctor continued to give him the drug but because he stopped it, forcing Jackson to take extreme measures.

“What we will hear is that Dr. Murray provided propofol for two months to Michael Jackson for sleep,” Chernoff said. “During those two months, Michael Jackson slept. He woke up and he lived his life.

“The evidence will not show you that Michael Jackson died because Dr. Murray gave him propofol. The evidence is going to show you Michael Jackson died when Dr. Murray stopped,” the attorney
said. He said Murray was trying to wean Jackson off of propofol and had been giving him other sleep aids known as benzodiazepines trying to lull him to sleep.

On June 25, 2009, the last day of Jackson’s life, Chernoff said, he was in the third day of a weaning process and it didn’t work.

“Michael Jackson started begging. He couldn’t understand why he wasn’t sleeping. … When Michael Jackson told Dr. Murray ‘I have to sleep. They will cancel my performance,’ he meant it,” Chernoff said.

Murray, in a recording of his interview with police detectives, acknowledged that he relented and agreed to give Jackson a small dose of propofol.

Walgren said Murray’s claim that he gave the singer a minuscule dosage, enough to keep him asleep perhaps five minutes, was not true. He also accused Murray of deception when he hid from
paramedics and hospital emergency staff that he had given Jackson propofol. He said they were desperately trying to revive him but didn’t know about the drug.

He returned repeatedly to the fee Murray was to be paid – $150,000 a month – and pointed out that he first had asked for $5 million.

“There was no doctor-patient relationship,” Walgren said. “…What existed here was an employer-employee relationship. He was not working for the health of Michael Jackson. Dr. Murray was working for a fee of $150,000.”

Chernoff countered with a description of Murray’s history of treating indigent patients for free. At times during the defence attorney’s opening statements, Murray appeared to be crying and
wiped his eyes with a tissue.

Jackson’s family members appeared pained as Walgren described the singer as a vulnerable figure, left alone with drugs coursing through his body.

“It violates not only the standard of care but the decency of one human being to another,” he said. “Dr. Murray abandoned Michael when he needed help.”

Following opening statements, Jackson’s choreographer and friend, Kenny Ortega, testified that Jackson was in bad shape physically and mentally less than a week before his death.

He said he sent a message to Randy Phillips, producer of the “This Is It” concert, telling him that Jackson was ill, probably should have a psychological evaluation and was not ready to perform.

“It’s important for everyone to know he really wants this,” he wrote. “It would shatter him, break his heart if we pulled the plug. He’s terribly frightened it’s all going to go away.”

In response to the email, Ortega said, a meeting was called at Jackson’s house where Ortega clashed with Murray, who told him to stop playing amateur psychiatrist and doctor.

“He said, ‘Michael was physically and emotionally capable of handling all his responsibilities for the show,”‘ said Ortega, “I was shocked. Michael didn’t seem to be physically or emotionally stable.”

Within a few days, he said, Jackson had recouped his energy and was full of enthusiasm for the show.

State Department hearings for Keystone XL oil pipeline draw Nebraska backers, critics

LINCOLN, Neb. – U.S. State Department representatives received an earful Tuesday from supporters and opponents of a proposed Canadian oil pipeline that would cross part of Nebraska’s vast underground water supply.

Both sides traded boos and jeers Tuesday during an emotional federal hearing in downtown Lincoln.

The sides staged dueling rallies in front of the Pershing Center.

Story continues below

HangZhou Night Net

Pipeline supporters, dressed in bright orange, waved signs that read, “Keystone Unlocks Good Jobs for Nebraska,” and “Reason, Not Extremism.” Opponents sported red with black arm bands, flashed “Protect the Sandhills” signs and handed out shirts that said, “But Dad, our cows can’t drink oil.”

The rowdy hearing marked the second day of hearings this week in the six states that would be crossed by the Keystone XL pipeline that’s being proposed by Calgary-based TransCanada Corp. (TSX:TRP).

The debate has drawn the greatest attention in Nebraska, where the proposed route would cross part of the Ogallala Aquifer, which supplies drinking water to about 2 million people.

Pipeline opponent Dan Rudnick of Lincoln said he’d like to see state and federal action to at least reroute the pipeline around the Ogallala Aquifer.

Nebraska state Sen. Ken Haar, a leading pipeline critic, urged State Department officials to delay their decision on the Keystone XL pipeline or reject it. Federal officials have said they will decide by the year’s end.

Haar said the federal government and TransCanada are trying to define the national interest and “don’t give a damn about Nebraska.”

Nebraska State Senator Jim Smith, a pipeline supporter, said the proposed route is the safest and most environmental. As he finished his remarks, protesters shouted, “Shame on you!”

The pipeline would move oilsands crude from northern Alberta and hook up to TransCanada’s existing pipelines and move oil to U.S. refineries in Oklahoma and along the Gulf of Mexico.

The State Department, which has to approve the pipeline because it would cross the U.S.-Canada border, is expected to decide by the end of the year.

TransCanada and its supporters say the pipeline would mean tens of thousands of U.S. jobs and more energy security for the country.

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper told reporters in New York over the weekend that U.S. approval of the oil pipeline is a “no-brainer” since the project would bring thousands of jobs and also ensure a secure source of energy for the United States.

Despite those reassurances, the project has become a flashpoint for environmental groups, who say the pipeline would bring “dirty oil” that requires huge amounts of energy to extract and could cause an ecological disaster in case of a spill. Opponents have urged Obama to block the project as a sign he is serious about reducing greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming.

Environmental activists, including actress Daryl Hannah and NASA scientist James Hansen, have been arrested in ongoing protests outside the White House the past two weeks.

In Ottawa, several hundred people showed up on Parliament Hill on Monday to protest the pipeline plans and the growth in the oilsands industry.

The demonstration was organized by Greenpeace and other groups who say the pipeline from Alberta to Texas is harmful to the environment in both Canada and the United States.

With files from The Canadian Press